Our post entitled Late to the Party on October 27, 2015, pointed out that even back then, Coeur d’Alene Press Publisher Jim Thompson (left in photo) and Editor Mike Patrick were waaaaay late to the urban renewal agency examination party.
Well, again today Frick and Frack demonstrated their remarkable ability to editorialize in arrears. This morning’s editorial was headlined You can’t blame ’em for asking.
The editorial finally and we suspect begrudgingly acknowledged that for years Coeur d’Alene’s urban renewal agency, ignite cda (née Lake City Development Corporation), had been engaging in “… the practice of lining friendly pockets under the guise of resurrecting worn-down parts of town.”
Honest and diligent citizens like Mary Souza, Dan Gookin, Kathy Sims, Sharon Culbreth, Frank Orzell, and others have been delivering the evidence of that practice for years. The Press chose not to investigate and then report it as news.
But today’s editorial contained a real whopper. (more…)
Today the US Department of Justice filed its 43-page Government’s Reply in Support of Motion to Compel and Opposition to Apple Inc.’s Motion to Vacate Order.
The issue to be decided at the end of all this is whether Apple must obey a lawful court order compelling it to bypass safeguards on one specific Apple iPhone 5C used by the San Berdo Two terrorists.
We have linked to the two earlier filings in our preceding Apple Bites posts.
Regardless of how our readers feel about the issue, the filings by both Apple and the Department of Justice do a good job of explaining the challenges created by public key encryption and attendant security features in telecommunications devices.
Comments Off on Apple Bites, Part 4
When it comes to accurate reporting of news, this screen cap exemplifies why we have come to call them ‘skews media’ rather than news media. It has become increasingly apparent that in what used to be called journalism, accuracy in reporting and editing have been flushed.
Idaho Governor Clement L. Otter churned out a press release today in which he called for the reinstatement of the historic horse racing/instant racing terminals in Idaho.
Our earlier OpenCdA posts expressed our views on how this entire debacle was propagated by almost everyone in state government except the janitors who clean the restrooms at the Capitol.
So while we agree it is noble to try and make whole those equine-related businesses who were financially damaged by a reckless Idaho Legislature, we want to say, “Whoa, Governor!” (more…)
Several skews agencies (Newsmax, Fox News, etc.) are reporting that presidential candidates Donald Trump and Dr. Ben Carson will soon receive Secret Service protection. That is probably correct.
The skews agencies also imply that the Secret Service determines which presidential candidates get protection. That is wrong.
Major candidates for President and Vice President as identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security are eligible receive Secret Service protection after the Secretary has consulted with the Congressional Advisory Committee (Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority Leader, Senate Minority Leader, and one additional member selected by the others). Those candidates can decline protection if they choose.
Criteria have been established to assist the DHS Secretary and the Congressional Advisory Committee in their decision making (as of 2008). Candidates must:
- Be publicly announced
- Have some degree of prominence as shown by opinion polls
- Be actively campaigning and entered in at least 10 state primaries
- Be seeking the nomination of a qualified party
- Have qualified for matching funds in the amount of at least $100,000
- Have received contributions totaling $10 million
Hillary Clinton receives protection not because of her candidacy but because former presidents and their spouses are entitled by law to receive it for life or until the deceased president’s surviving spouse remarries. Former president’s children receive protection until age 16. The protection is offered to “formers” but can be declined. Only former President Richard Nixon declined protection after he left office.
OpenCdA speculates that candidate Bernie Sanders does not yet meet one or more of the required criteria. However, the President could still direct the Secret Service to provide him with protection.
Comments Off on Who Gets It?
On June 18th, radio and television baseball broadcasting legend Vin Scully called the 19th no-hit baseball game of his career. In today’s story headlined Vin Scully stays up to date with his no-hitter calls, Scully was asked the inevitable “Will you be back broadcasting next year?” question.
Scully responded, “”I don’t want to just be hanging on. That’s why I want to watch my work and, if I’m worthy of it, continue.”
Wise words spoken sincerely and honestly. We don’t think Scully would mind if public officials emulated him and practiced similar introspection and humility.
Comments Off on Wise Words
The image below was copied from a Los Angeles Times opinion piece online today. Use your appropriate mouse button to enlarge the image.
Note the image’s caption identifies the three handguns as “Glock handguns. ”
Well, no. While we are not firearms aficionados, we do immediately recognize the handgun in the upper right as being a Sig Sauer (very likely a P226), but certainly not a Glock.
Maybe before editorializing about gun control, Times writer Scott Martelle might want to take a handgun orientation and safety course.
(Mouse click on image to enlarge)
ADDENDUM on 05-29-2014 at 2:30 PM: We just followed the link to the entire LA Times op-ed piece and notice the word “Glock” has now been removed from the photo’s caption. However, there is no mention of a correction in the op-ed.
Dear Newsletter Readers,
Happy New Year! I have a feeling that 2014 will be a much better year, all around. Our new mayor, Steve Widmyer, along with the rest of the new council, were sworn into office last Tuesday… out with the old, and in with the new. On that note, let me cover a couple of year-end decisions by the old mayor and council. File these tidbits under the category “Elections have consequences”. Or maybe, better yet, let’s call it “To the victors go the spoils”: (more…)
Today’s Los Angeles Times reporting about the public corruption trial of Bell, California’s former Deputy City Administrator explains how DCA Spaccia and City Administrator Rizzo allegedly inflated their own salaries.
This is the kind of detailed, how-it-was done news reporting that educates voters and helps make it more difficult for corrupt public officials. One of the best courtroom exchanges reported in today’s Times story could have applied here in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho:
[Bell’s former Financial Officer Lourdes] Garcia said she assumed the city attorney had reviewed the council resolution that contained the vacation increases and that Rizzo told staff members that he would discuss changes with council members.
“Did you assume the City Council was voting on things they never read?” Garcia was asked by Spaccia’s attorney, Harland Braun.
“Probably,” she said.
Comments Off on Tutorial: How to Inflate Your City Salary