OpenCDA

December 6, 2020

Is History Repeating Today?

Filed under: Probable Cause — Tags: , , — Bill @ 5:11 pm

battle-of-athens-tn-signA friend of mine and I have been exchanging observations and opinions about the apparently well-coordinated election manipulation involving several states in the 2020 presidential election.

A few days ago my friend reminded me that a similar though much smaller event occurred in the USA just after WW II had ended.  He sent a 13-1/2 minute video excerpt from a longer historical documentary reenactment movie.  The excerpt by Jeremy Hopper is entitled The Battle of Athens:  Fighting Voter & Election Fraud.  Note that the excerpt was first posted on YouTube on December 28, 2011.

For a much more complete, inspiring, and very readable account, please read The Battle of Athens, Tennessee a post by Alexis Anthony Koeppel on the website of The Valiant Defender’s Party.  After you’ve read that, you may want to also read the remarks of former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt about the Battle of Athens.

Here’s a mental challenge for you:  Identify as many broad similarities as you can between the 1946 election in the rural Tennessee county seat town of Athens and the national campaign and election for President and many members of Congress in 2020.  Consider and compare the broad motivations of those willing to rig the outcome of both elections.  Identify the external forces (“outsiders”) and the internal forces (government “insiders”) involved in rigging both elections.  Compare the reactions of the citizens of Athens to their election being rigged to the reactions of you and your fellow citizens in the USA to the 2020 elections being rigged.

2 Comments

  1. The USA didn’t have an election in 2020. It had a coup.

    Comment by Dan Gookin — December 6, 2020 @ 6:50 pm

  2. Dan,

    This was worse than a coup.

    Participants in a coup almost always know that’s what they’re engaging in.

    Rigging a presidential election requires that most of the voters believe that their actions (voting) are being lawfully conducted. The legal voters are an important instrumentality of the conspiracy in that their legal votes provide the big turnout to give the appearance of legitimacy. The most likely criminally liable conspirators were the participants in the January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting memorialized in this email to herself by meeting participant National Security Advisor Susan Rice. Others became participants when they performed actions they knew or should have known to be illegal (e.g., reprogramming voting systems equipment to switch votes from one candidate to a different one according to an algorithm, multiple reading and tabulation of a ballot identified as bearing the desired votes, forging elector signatures, etc.).

    The detective work in this conspiracy is going to rely heavily on software engineers to decode and explain the malicious software, and it’s going to rely on mathematicians and statisticians to demonstrate the mathematical improbability of some of the voting patterns in those battleground election tabulations that were jiggered. It will also require some forensic document examination of the “pristine” mail-in ballots that were never mailed out but yet appeared to have identical machine-generated oval fill-ins with the only oval filled in being for ChiCom Joe before the phantom mail-in ballots were tabulated.

    My fear is that the one and only conviction will turn out to be the DoJ attorney who admitted altering the falsified FISA warrant affidavit.

    Comment by Bill — December 6, 2020 @ 8:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress
Copyright © 2021 by OpenCDA LLC, All Rights Reserved