OpenCDA

August 28, 2009

IFF Honors OpenCdA!

Filed under: General — mary @ 10:49 am

gif Idaho Freedom Foundation has published a strong article supporting our web site and our efforts to bring transparency to local government.  We are especially honored because this group, headquartered in southern Idaho, works statewide to achieve the same goals.  Here’s the entirety of their article, republished with their permission:

Residents Unite to take on Government in Coeur d’Alene

By Chuck Malloy

Conservative movements don’t start by accident, or survive on automatic pilot.

The tide starts with people who give a damn about how government money is spent and the future of this country. It starts with people who don’t think that government has all the answers to health care and the nation’s economic crisis. It survives by people who want to make a difference by attending local government meetings, searching through public records and asking tough questions.  

In Coeur d’Alene, the conservative movement is well under way and going strong thanks to a group of people who do not blindly accept what their local government leaders are telling them. Mary Souza, Bill McCrory and Dan Gookin, who started this effort about two years ago, are especially offended by the notion of non-elected people – specifically the Lake City Development Corporation – making decisions that have an impact on property taxes.

Soon, the group will announce that it has an officials name (detractors call them CAVE people, which stands for Citizens Against Virtually Everything. Meanwhile, the group has a website (opencda.com) with plenty of spicy commentary, a growing number of followers and a generous amount of feedback from readers.

“It’s easy for me to talk about being involved, because I’m retired,” said McCrory, who spent 23 years with the U.S. Secret Service. “A lot of people don’t have the time and I can understand that. I view our involvement as a way of contributing to the community, although local government officials don’t see this as a contribution.”

The three founders of opencda.com have different backgrounds and slightly different political philosophies. McCrory says he’s an independent, Souza says she’s a Republican and Gookin says he’s a libertarian. What all three have in common is that they are conservative – but not in the CAVE sort of way. They’re all for economic prosperity, good city services, a quality school system and well-maintained streets and roads. They just want to ensure that officials put thought into the process and are held accountable for their actions.

“Elected officials should be viewing questions from citizens in a positive way,” said Gookin. “It helps having citizens reviewing policies. We have a right to ask elected officials questions. Asking questions is not being against everything.”

Some gains have been made. LCDC, for instance, has started broadcasting meetings on the local cable television channel. The development corporation has hired a public relations agent to bolster its image – to the chagrin of those who object to tax dollars being spent to make LCDC look great.

“They pay attention to us,” said Gookin, who two years ago came within 360 votes of winning a seat on the city council. “They know we’re there, and they’ve changed the way they do business.”

However, it’s still not to the satisfaction of the Open CDA group. As they see it, the LCDC’s mission is to leverage public money into private projects such as condominiums, townhouses and office buildings. The group asks: Is this a wise way of spending taxpayer dollars?

All three have become lightening rods of sorts. But Mary Souza, who for the last two years has produced newsletters and commentaries, has become the one that some people love and others love to hate. She doesn’t have a journalism background; she is a local business owner. But she has what every newspaper columnist wants and few have – impact. Her writing style is easy to read and she pours on lots of salsa in her commentaries.

The LCDC is one of her favorite targets. Her role as a former member of the city’s planning and zoning board gives her special insight.

In June, she wrote: “For the year 2008, the LCDC received a tax increment of almost $5 million dollars. The un-elected board of LCDC has complete control over how that public money is used and this district will go out to the year 2021.”

In another commentary last February, she pointed out that the problem with urban renewal districts go beyond Coeur d’Alene.

“There’s $3.6 billion in tax increment value controlled by urban renewal agencies in the state of Idaho. And this number will grow faster than the economy will recover. Taxpayers have a serious problem right now, because URAs are both rich and powerful. They use public tax increment money for lobbyists to stop any changes in the porous old laws. The vague legal language and loopholes, along with the complexity of the subject, keep most citizens, as well as many lawmakers, from taking the time to understand urban renewal. This reluctance helps ensure the stealth success of this little-known tax impact.”

She goes after the local school board and issues such as property taxes and the federal stimulus package with the same kind of gusto.

Urban Renewal Districts were the main reason for the group forming, but not the only reason for existence. Souza, McCrory, Gookin and a growing list of others are pushing for accountability and transparency at all levels.

It’s not an easy fight, but can be winnable over time – especially in the Coeur d’Alene area. Twenty years ago, the liberal Democratic Party machine had a stronghold on legislative seats in the Coeur d’Alene. In more recent years, liberals have been replaced by conservatives such as Sen. Mike Jorgenson and Reps. Jim Clark, Phil Hart and Bob Nonini. Rep. Marge Chadderdon, a Republican who is viewed in some circles as an easy target because of her quiet nature, has no problem winning elections.

The liberal faction in Coeur d’Alene hasn’t gone away; it has merely migrated to the Coeur d’Alene City Council and other areas of local government. Souza and Gookin ran unsuccessfully for city council seats and Gookin’s performance in the last election (46 percent) gives hope to conservatives. Tea party rallies (about 1,600 people showed up for one) offers evidence that people are paying attention.

“Our impact is hard to quantify,” Souza said. “People are visiting our website and when I go to the store, or to meetings, people are stopping to talk with me.”

The conservative movement in Coeur d’Alene has a way to go, but two things are clear: The number of people who give a damn is well beyond three and this effort is not going away anytime soon.

(OpenCdA note:  Chuck Malloy is a well known writer and adviser on issues of political importance in Idaho.  You can access their site here: http://www.idahofreedom.net/node )

9 Comments

  1. It will be interesting to see how our next set of local elections go as well as the next federal elections. If nothing else Obama is demonstrating a reckless degree of liberalism that is catalyzing conservatives and moderates alike. He is scaring the hell out of a lot of people. I think we’re due for a conservative voting block backlash. Anything but who sits to the left of midstream should be a better option.

    Here locally this also echoes because our local yokels are nearly as reckless with their fiscal mismanagement. They have been consistently imprudent with their decisions and arrogant about how they conducted them. And the city coffers are now in dire straights. The same tidal wave of national discontent may provide enough local impetus to sweep some our incumbents aside.

    Boy howdy we could sure use some fresh and unblue blood in our local leadership.

    Comment by Wallypog — August 28, 2009 @ 2:20 pm

  2. Thanks for the Idaho freedom link…I await my first communication.
    Any group that is a friend of Open CdA must be a friend of mine.

    Comment by citizen — August 28, 2009 @ 2:26 pm

  3. I find it incredible that MikeK has to go to Boise and enlist the help of Boise’s mayor and Rep.Walt Minnick
    to raise money for his re-election campaign for CDA city councilman.Why not raise money here and talk to your constituents in CDA,instead of going to Boise?

    Comment by kageman — August 28, 2009 @ 3:04 pm

  4. Because he is a Kennedy?

    Comment by citizen — August 28, 2009 @ 6:39 pm

  5. kage, who’s to say he isn’t raising money here as well and I know and you know he talks to constituents here in cda. As far a raising money for a campaign goes, nothing illegal about getting donations from friends, family, or anyone for that matter, it’s a free country.
    Listen, the guy with the most money doesn’t always win, indeed it helps but it’s not certain. By your logic I surmize that if Joseph Stalin was runnning and could only get campaing money locally, then all he needs to do it get the richest guy to support him and he will win.

    Comment by Eric — August 29, 2009 @ 7:57 am

  6. There’s no surprise or mystery that Kennedy captures loads of campaign funds from non-local sources. Fact is that in his first election the majority of his campaign contributions came from out of state. Another fact is that he garnered and used more campaign funds than had ever been collected or spent for a local council seat election. No doubt we can expect a replay this election. But this time the voters are aware of who owns Kennedy and how he keep his owners happy.

    Comment by Wallypog — August 29, 2009 @ 8:19 am

  7. Wally, who owns him? And how does he keep them happy? I don’t mean for this to sound pugnatious, I seriously am curious. Being a voter I would like to know.

    I can see your point about a majority of money from outside the area. How much did he and how much did the other guys get locally? Are they similiar or did the others get more local money? OK, just for example, lets say locals gave $2,000 and lets say his Mom, who lives in, ummm, New York, gave $5,000, well certainly in that case the majority came from out of state. Are we to say Mom can’t contribute? I mean come on.
    Alright I know that’s not exactly how it went but money can come from friends, family, and yes, potential evil doers, depending, of course, what side of the fence one might be on.

    Comment by Eric — August 29, 2009 @ 8:43 am

  8. Let me carefully respond, Eric. As one of the candidates in the three way race won by Mr. Kennedy four years ago, I paid attention to the details of that race. It’s true that Mike Kennedy raised more money for the ’05 race than any other city election in the history of this town. He spent about $26,000 (raised more than that) to win a city council seat that pays $700 per month. Does that make sense to you?

    Shortly after winning the council seat, Mike Kennedy was given a job as President of Intermax, a technical communications company owned by Steve Meyer who donated heavily to Mike’s campaign. Mike Kennedy had no background in technical communications. Steve Meyer’s main business is Parkwood Properties, a real estate development company, one of the top 5 private land owners in Kootenai County, where his partner is Charlie Nipp who still sits on the LCDC and was chairman of the LCDC for its first 11 years until he was admonished by the Idaho Attorney General for failing to disclose his relationship as a Mountain West Bank board member while he signed 6 different loans between LCDC and Mt. West Bank. Steve Meyer is also on that bank’s board and Steve and Charlie are both owners in its holding company. Steve’s wife, Judy, is a NIC Board Trustee and Steve himself is on the NIC Foundation.

    I could go on, but that is sufficient for now.

    Comment by mary — August 29, 2009 @ 9:40 am

  9. Thank you Mary. Funny how some people insist that the gorilla standing on their foot remains somehow invisible.

    Comment by Wallypog — August 29, 2009 @ 12:45 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress
Copyright © 2024 by OpenCDA LLC, All Rights Reserved