Assuming the McClatchy reporting is accurate, former Secretary of State and current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had two documents classified TOP SECRET on her private email server in the basement of her Chappaqua, New York home.
The TOP SECRET classification means the original classifying authority certified that unauthorized disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe. TOP SECRET is the highest national security classification.
When she served as Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, Hillary Clinton would have had original classification authority. With that authority comes some expectations and obligations concerning the safeguarding of national security information. (more…)
Comments Off on Damage to National Security?
Are citizens of Idaho being targeted for potential recruitment as spies by a foreign intelligence service?
Our OpenCdA post on July 11 titled OPM Hack – The Real Damage briefly explained the underlying significance of the information gleaned from hacked personnel records entrusted to the US Office of Personnel Management. The hack has been attributed to the People’s Republic of China’s intelligence service, the Guoanbu. The information obtained in the hack would have helped the Guoanbu assess US citizens’ vulnerability to be induced to commit espionage.
Now we learn from a July 30, 2015, NBC news story headlined Exclusive: Secret NSA Map Shows China Cyber Attacks on U.S. Targets that Idaho was one of the 48 contiguous states confirmed to have been targeted over a five year period. Although the July 30 article uses the term “cyber attacks”, a subsequent NBC news article on August 10, 2015, entitled China Reads Emails of Top U.S. Officials uses the same map. Since the snitched emails came from the officials’ private and not government email accounts, we can conclude the emails contained personal, very private communications about individuals’ personal behaviors and transactions. That very private information is useful in identifying factors which could be used by an intelligence service case officer to control his agent of espionage or influence. As Theodore Roosevelt astutely observed, “If you’ve got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.” So will sensitive information they may have.
For a reasonably informative, Hollywood-ized video portraying the ChiCom’s economic espionage efforts in the US, take a look at the FBI’s 36-minute YouTube production The Company Man – Protecting America’s Secrets. It’s dramatized to make it entertaining, but it is still not a bad tutorial in how foreign intelligence services spot, assess, and attempt to recruit US citizens to provide economic intelligence.
It’s also worth reading the FBI’s July 23 web page entitled Economic Espionage – FBI Launches Nationwide Awareness Campaign.
Unless you get your news only from The Spokesman-Review or the Coeur d’Alene Press, you know the story of Dr. Farid Fata, the highly-respected and revered Michigan oncologist who late last week received a 45-year prison sentence for administering poison — cancer chemotherapy — to 550 “patients” who either didn’t need it at all or needed different and often less frequent dosages. Some of his “patients” died because of Dr. Fata’s admitted lust for money and power.
Fata’s conduct was despicable, but he had help from fellow doctors and state regulators who knew in April 2010 that what Fata was doing was harmful to his “patients” but who consciously avoided doing their professional duty to expose and stop him. Their failure of duty was almost as despicable as Fata’s greed for money and compulsion for power and acclaim.
Nurse Angela Swantek received little encouragement after her efforts in 2010 to expose Fata’s willfully administering treatments that harmed his victims. But OpenCdA is completely unsurprised by the State of Michigan’s unwillingness to act. Fata was a highly-respected oncologist who had trained at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. Why would a state regulatory agency take the time to investigate the factually-supported allegations of a “justa” (as in, “She’s just a nurse”) over that of someone who was clearly her better, in this case, a medical doctor prominent in the community?
But it’s fair to ask: If the state of Michigan’s investigatory department, now called the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), had taken nurse Angela Swantek’s well-documented facts seriously in 2010, could the suffering and pain Fata inflicted directly on his “patients” and indirectly on their families have been stopped sooner?
OpenCdA hopes that during the inevitable civil lawsuits that will follow, the misconduct and clear failures of duty of other medical professionals and public officials will be fully and completely revealed. Their actions and failures to act are almost as despicable as those of Dr. Farid Fata.
By now readers probably know that Katherine Archuleta, director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), resigned Friday. Her politically-expedient “resignation” was inevitable after the compromise of sensitive information in the personnel files of at least 21.5 million present and former federal employees, files OPM is responsible for securely maintaining and storing. The feds suspect that the Ministry of State Security of the People’s Republic of China, the Guojia Anquan Bu or Guoanbu, is behind the data breach.
Ho-hum. We’ve heard this all before — same song, different orchestra. This time, the amount of data swiped was huge, but so what? Should you or I really care if the Guoanbu filched a ton of Social Security numbers from OPM? No. And yes.
No, because it’s doubtful the Chicoms intend to raid Social Security’s funds (Besides, Congress beat them to it years ago.)
Yes, because if the hack was committed by the Guoanbu or any other competent foreign intelligence agency, the files they got were very sensitive investigative files on applicants for US government security clearances and special accesses. Investigative files — information uncovered during the course of an applicant’s background investigation — not just Social Security numbers. Those files would include credible derogatory information that might reflect on the applicant’s suitability to have access to sensitive classified and special access information affecting the national security. In most instances some of those investigative files are off-limits to even the applicant. That’s precisely the information a foreign intelligence service would love to get its hands on when its case officers are spotting prospective Americans who might be persuaded or induced to betray the United States. (more…)
This week we learned that Coeur d’Alene’s urban renewal agency, which some affectionately refer to as The First Unregulated Bank of Idaho, will officially change its name from LCDC to “ignite cda”.
That same article from the local skews paper also reported that the LCDC/burnout board decided to spend just under $55,000 to tell the public about the change. That reminded us of the cartoon the legendary editorial cartoonist Jimmy Barona did in 2011. It first appeared in Mary Souza’s OpenCdA post entitled Stall Tactics in October 2011.
As far as we at OpenCdA are concerned, the LCDC can call itself ignite cda or whatever it chooses. The result is the same: Same pig, just a different shade of lipstick.
But, in the spirit of support your local bucket-o-cash, we think ignite cda needs a slogan. We’d humbly suggest that as we approach the 50th anniversary of the 1965 Watts Riots, “Burn, baby, burn!” would fit. Or maybe we should say “Berns, baby, Berns”.
ignite cda might decide to emulate Spokane’s Pig Out in the Park, only ignite cda would call it “Flame out in McEuen Park”.
Anyone else want to suggest ways the LCDC/ignite cda can transform the pig into a beauty queen?
Our post on June 15, 2015, entitled More Questions – Few Black and White Answers raised our own questions about Rachel Dolezal’s strange statements.
Today, the City of Spokane released a document entitled Report of the City of Spokane Whistleblower Committee. It provides additional information and allegations about Rachel Dolezal’s conduct on the Office of Police Ombudsman Commission. The Report asserts that the “… investigation substantiated [complainant’s name redacted] claims and revealed additional violations of law and City policies.” The complaint had been lodged against Commissioners Dolezal, Berkompas, and Dominguez.
We assume more information will be forthcoming.
Like many others in our area, OpenCdA is intrigued by the news, skews, and views stories about Rachel Dolezal. We have not formed an opinion about her behavior because we’re not at all clear what the issues are.
However, we have some questions of our own for which timely, factual answers would help us be (1) better informed or (2) more confused. (more…)
OpenCdA highly recommends that you read Idaho Statesman reporter Cynthia Sewell’s article headlined Officers allege interference, retaliation at Idaho State Police after crash probe.
Briefly, lawsuits have been filed against the ISP by some former and present ISP officers who allege they were ordered to change accident reports to protect a Payette County deputy sheriff. They further allege that they were retaliated against by members of the ISP command staff when they refused to change the reports.
If you’re going to read Sewell’s article, we also suggest you read the sidebar hyperlinks in “Other Related Content.” Most of those hyperlinks are court filings, however they are merely allegations and observations, not conclusive evidence. The allegations would have to be supported by evidence at trial.
The public wants to believe our law enforcement officers are honest and that their investigations will be objective, factual, and complete. In this particular case, the ISP investigators assigned some degree of fault for the accident to the Payette County deputy. The documents linked in Sewell’s article suggest that the ISP command staff may have encouraged subordinate investigators to slant the reports to avoid the deputy’s being criminally prosecuted. For example, ISP Deputy Director Lieutenant Colonel Kedrick Wills allegedly told one of the investigators who had assigned fault to the deputy that “… he could not believe ISP was going to send a deputy to prison.” (If Wills’ name sounds familiar, it might be because his father, Richard Wills, is an Idaho state legislator and retired ISP Corporal.)
We hope the Idaho Statesman continues its excellent reporting on a matter of statewide interest.
This past week the US Department of Justice (DoJ) announced that four multinational banks had recently agreed to plead guilty to felony antitrust violations and pay criminal fines and penalties approaching $3 billion. A fifth bank agreed to plead guilty and pay a $203 million criminal penalty for breaking the non-prosecution agreement it entered in December 2012 regarding manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR – a benchmark interest rate used worldwide.
Simply put, these five banks agreed to plead guilty to manipulating the interest rates that nearly every consumer has to pay when we borrow money for mortgages, car loans, college loans, business loans, etc. (more…)
By now you may have heard that on May, 19, 2015, a former employee of the Red Robin Restaurant in Riverstone filed a federal lawsuit alleging she was wrongfully terminated by that restaurant chain after she objected to the firing of one employee and the rejection of an applicant because they were “of color”.
Here is a link to the federal complaint filed by plaintiff Stacie Ward against Red Robin International, Inc. The case was filed in federal district court and assigned case number 2:15-cv-00168-JVL. Ward alleges in the complaint that “The [Coeur d’Alene Red Robin store ] General Manager Reed Faucet (wrongfully) terminated Stacie for cause on or about October 27, 2012. Also present at Stacie’s termination was Alicia DiAgastino, the Assistant General Manager, and by information and belief, Ms. DiAgastino is now General Manager of the Coeur d’Alene store.”
Ward’s complaint states precisely the language allegedly used by the Riverstone Red Robin store’s Assistant General Manager. It also states her allegations of “retaliation and harassment by the management” against Ward.
The complaint informs readers that “Stacie filed a complaint with the Idaho Human Rights Commission/EEOC. The EEOC conducted its investigation, and found probable cause that Red Robin had retaliated against her and issued its Right To Sue letter on February 26, 2015.”
Ward’s legal counsel is Douglas A. Pierce of James, Vernon & Weeks, P.A. in Coeur d’Alene.
OpenCdA wonders why the Kootenai County Task Force on Human Relations has not vocally and visibly protested the allegations of racial discrimination by one of Coeur d’Alene’s local businesses. This case would certainly generate the publicity and attention that group usually seeks for itself and the City of Coeur d’Alene. What could the reason be?