“An initial investigation by the KCSO after the incident revealed that alcohol did not appear to be a factor in the death. However, reports in the community began to swirl that alcohol was indeed involved. The coroner’s findings confirms those reports.”
That paragraph from today’s Coeur d’Alene Press skews paper article headlined Report: Alcohol related to teen’s death completely and convincingly validates the Reggie Nault family’s reasoning for engaging professional, objective, qualified legal counsel to evaluate the results of the Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office (KCSO) investigation into the young man’s unattended death.
That paragraph from reporter Brian Walker’s article sent chills up our spine. Please read it again. Carefully. (more…)
According to Tuesday’s Coeur d’Alene Press skews paper article headlined Nault’s family still seeks answers, some family members of deceased Coeur d’Alene High School student Reggie Nault have engaged an attorney to monitor the Kootenai County Sheriff’s Department investigation into his death.
OpenCdA sympathetically but loudly commends the young man’s family for engaging an attorney to represent them in their efforts to learn the facts leading or contributing to his death.
When someone dies as this young man did and the facts of his death are slow in coming, family and friends are deeply emotionally involved. That very understandable emotional involvement can sometimes lead to clouded judgements. In this instance, the young man’s family seems to have recognized that they would be comforted by having a professional and competent advocate evaluate the information unemotionally and objectively as it comes in. The family properly and wisely engaged an attorney to represent them in seeking and evaluating the results of the investigation.
To some, the family’s engaging an attorney looks like the prelude to a wrongful death action.
To others, engaging an attorney looks like the family is dissatisfied with the progress of the investigation.
Both perspectives have some merit, and both validate the family’s taking exactly the action it did.
As OpenCdA has often said, the Kootenai County justice rug has become lumpier and lumpier as incidents have been swept under it. By engaging an attorney to monitor the investigation of Reggie Nault’s death and evaluate the results of that investigation, the young man’s family is honoring his life by using his death to keep a trained and watchful eye on those who might be tempted to lift the rug’s edge and sweep again. The facts are the facts, and they will not change.
There can be no genuinely good outcome when a young person dies prematurely. The closest thing to a comforting outcome is that the person’s family hopes others will learn from the facts of his death and use what they learn to help themselves and others avoid similar outcomes.
We think the Nault family’s action toward that end is honorable and commendable.
Several skews agencies (Newsmax, Fox News, etc.) are reporting that presidential candidates Donald Trump and Dr. Ben Carson will soon receive Secret Service protection. That is probably correct.
The skews agencies also imply that the Secret Service determines which presidential candidates get protection. That is wrong.
Major candidates for President and Vice President as identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security are eligible receive Secret Service protection after the Secretary has consulted with the Congressional Advisory Committee (Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority Leader, Senate Minority Leader, and one additional member selected by the others). Those candidates can decline protection if they choose.
Criteria have been established to assist the DHS Secretary and the Congressional Advisory Committee in their decision making (as of 2008). Candidates must:
- Be publicly announced
- Have some degree of prominence as shown by opinion polls
- Be actively campaigning and entered in at least 10 state primaries
- Be seeking the nomination of a qualified party
- Have qualified for matching funds in the amount of at least $100,000
- Have received contributions totaling $10 million
Hillary Clinton receives protection not because of her candidacy but because former presidents and their spouses are entitled by law to receive it for life or until the deceased president’s surviving spouse remarries. Former president’s children receive protection until age 16. The protection is offered to “formers” but can be declined. Only former President Richard Nixon declined protection after he left office.
OpenCdA speculates that candidate Bernie Sanders does not yet meet one or more of the required criteria. However, the President could still direct the Secret Service to provide him with protection.
Comments Off on Who Gets It?
Today’s Washington Post is reporting that according to a private security company report, the People’s Republic of China (Chicom) continued to “… penetrate the networks of U.S. companies to steal their secrets despite a pledge by China’s president that they would not do so …”.
According to the Crowd Strike timeline, in the 24 days since Chicom President Xi Jinping promised US President Barack Obama that the Chicoms would cease trying to hack into US computer networks to steal secrets, there have been numerous attempts on nine days to hack into US technology sector networks and numerous attempts on two days to hack into US pharmaceutical sector networks. And those are just the efforts that have been detected.
According to this report in The Hill today, the Chicom government-sponsored group Deep Panda has been responsible for these most recent hacks. The Hill article also states, “Deep Panda has also been tied to cyberattacks on U.S. foreign policy think tanks and individuals who are experts on the Middle East.”
So if a Chicom government-supported hacking group is going after US foreign policy think tanks and individuals who are experts on the Middle East, OpenCdA wonders if that same group might not have been put some effort in hacking the private email server of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton which was found to contain sensitive national security information? Gee, ya think?
We hope our series of posts has made the picture clearer.
Comments Off on China Cheats – Is It Clearer Now?
On Thursday, September 24, 2015, ABC News reported that, “The FBI has arrested a politically prominent Chinese millionaire [Ng Lap Seng], the alleged secret source of foreign money in a campaign finance scandal during the Clinton administration, on charges he lied about why he brought more than $4.5 million in cash into the United States over the last two years.”
Our August 13, 2015, OpenCdA post entitled The Clinton Family Trie (Huang , Hsia, and Riady, Too) reminded readers of the connection between the Clintons and Yah Lin “Charlie” Trie, a major fundraiser and long-time close friend of the President, who accepted a plea agreement in return for telling how he had routed illegal donations from the PRC to the Clinton Presidential Campaign. The ABC news story makes the connection between Trie and Ng.
Here is a link to the the federal criminal complaint.
Comments Off on More China Money?
OpenCdA has received word that northern Idaho’s Port of Hope, Inc., currently in Coeur d’Alene, has applied for a special use permit to establish a federal residential re-entry center in Post Falls. We believe this will result in the closure of the Coeur d’Alene facility which has been in operation since 1998.
OpenCdA fully understands the Port of Hope’s apparent desire to leave Coeur d’Alene. The shameful efforts by members of the City of Coeur d’Alene Planning Commission with help from employees of School District 271 to run Port of Hope out of town in 2013 were documented in this series of OpenCdA posts. Thankfully, the Coeur d’Alene City Council resoundingly rejected those efforts in its meeting on October 1, 2013.
We hope that the members of the Post Falls Planning & Zoning Commission will look at our posts linked above. These posts revealed how hysteria and deception can drive a completely unsupported decision in a planning commission hearing. Our hope is that however the Post Falls Planning & Zoning Commission rules on Port of Hope’s application, the Commissioners’ votes will be based entirely on their objective evaluation of the relevant evidence presented during the hearing.
Here is a link to the 198-page digital version of Ferguson Commission Report. The print version will be released to the public later today.
Even though the report primarily focuses on the greater St. Louis, MO, area, many of the findings and recommendations are applicable and worthy of consideration throughout the country.
Comments Off on The Ferguson Commission Report
For the reasons we’ve beaten to death in our earlier posts concerning historic horse racing machines in Idaho, OpenCdA agreed with Governor Otter’s decision to veto S 1011 passed during the 2015 legislative session. That bill repealed Idaho Code § 54-2512A. His decision to veto the repeal effort was the right one.
However, we also agree with the Idaho Supreme Court’s decision released September 10, 2015, to overturn Otter’s veto. Otter bungled the veto. It is impossible for us to believe that an honest, competent, and experienced governor could accidentally or even carelessly mess up the state’s clearly defined veto process.
To OpenCdA it looks as if Governor Clement L. Otter intended for his veto to be unable to withstand the inevitable and ultimately successful legal challenge that was mounted against it. (more…)
In her online newsletter dated September 3, 2015, State Senator Mary Souza offered some advice to the Coeur d’Alene Urban Renewal Agency.
Sen. Souza advised, “Ditch the new name and logo, cancel the PR contract, return to the original name of Coeur d’Alene Urban Renewal Agency. Get rid of the paid consultants, lobbyists and the overpaid executive director position. Hire a manager and a clerical assistant and let’s have the board members stand for public election. We can even pay them a small fee for their time, which would place them under a higher level of the Idaho Ethics law.”
OpenCdA agrees with Senator Souza. (more…)
Imagine that! In southern California the Inland Empire Public Corruption Task Force that includes the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service, the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office, and the San Bernardino District Attorney’s Office has served a search warrant at the Palm Springs, CA, city hall.
It has been alleged that Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet may have taken a walk on the shady side when he received about $200,000 from a local developer, Richard Meany. Seems Meany was going to need to purchase some Palm Springs city property for the project, so he hired the Palm Springs mayor to consult with him on the project. The mayor and council subsequently voted to approve the sale of the property to the developer at a questionable price .
Palm Springs is a resort city with a population of about 46,300 residents in the Coachella Valley.
Fortunately for us in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, nothing like that could ever happen here. Mayor Steve Widmyer would never have any close ties with any local developer and then be involved in a deal for city land with that developer’s company, right?
Comments Off on Corruption Investigation — Palm Springs Mayor