To very few people’s surprise, certainly not mine, just as Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation about Brett Kavanaugh began to unravel, the Hit Team has “found” another woman to raise another aged allegation. Next …!
This allegation goes back to 1983-84 when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale.
Notice that the time frame of Ford’s allegation was in about 1982. Deborah Ramirez’s allegation is in 1983-84.
Ramirez’s allegation addresses many of the credibility-damaging defects in Ford’s allegation. Imagine that! It’s a miracle!
When, I wonder, was the first background investigation (BI) report completed on Brett Kavanaugh by the federal government? Did his first BI include the time frame of either the alleged Ford or the alleged Ramirez incidents? If so, were the incidents included in the BI report? How did the adjudicator discuss and assess the “facts” surrounding these alleged incidents?
Given the time frame of both the Ford and Ramirez allegations, it is very likely the “facts” allegedly associated with them would (or should) have shown up in the reports written as part of Kavanaugh’s first full-field BI. If they weren’t reported in Kavanaugh’s first full-field BI, then it may mean these alleged incidents were never officially reported to police, schools, hospitals, etc. If the alleged incidents were reported to officials or were derived from interviews of listed and derived (spinoff) references, then they should be in the first BI reports. So should any adjudication of any effects the information had on Kavanaugh’s suitability determination for government employment or security clearance.
In some agencies’ BI reports, the investigator who conducted the interview is permitted to separately include his or her personal observations concerning the credibility (e.g., stated biases, cooperativeness, etc.) of the reporting party. When permitted, these are almost always under a separate, clearly marked heading such as “Agent’s Notes.”
If you’re part of a Hit Team trying to “find” witnesses who will compose credible derogatory information about an older applicant, you would try to “find” witnesses whose acquaintence with the applicant preceded the applicant’s first official BI.
The kind of allegations raised so far against Brett Kavanaugh would almost certainly have been reported and adjudicated in his first or subsequent full-field BIs if the incidents leading to the allegations occurred.
To believe that the US Senators who are screaming the loudest for another “FBI investigation” of Kavanaugh, you have to also believe the screaming Senators are too ignorant and too stupid to have security clearances themselves.
Then again, the Rankest Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein, did for decades have a driver allegedly with connections to the intelligence service of the People’s Republic of China, so …