When publicly elected or appointed government officials refuse to act according to law or they intentionally act outside the law, those same officials should hardly be surprised when the citizens who elected or appointed and trusted them choose to violate the law themselves to achieve desired and rightfully expected accountability.
On March 8, 1971, a group of citizens burglarized the FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania. They stole documents which showed the FBI had been conducting illegal surveillances and offensive counterintelligence operations against US citizens opposing the Vietnam war. Rightly or wrongly, the citizens felt “…compelled to do something as ordinary citizens because no one in Washington was holding Hoover accountable.”
Here in an AlterNet article one of the Media burglars, Bonnie Raines, outlines why she and the others took such an extreme action. The article is entitled Democracy Needs Whistleblowers – That’s Why I Broke Into the FBI in 1971. A more detailed account of the burglary is in Betty Medsger’s book just released yesterday and entitled The Burglary – The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover’s Secret FBI.
According to Raines, only the Washington Post published the Media papers. All the others chickened out until after the Post ran with it. What would have happened if the Post had been similarly cowed by the fear of Hoover? Is it fair to say that Congress would not have acted without the Post’s publishing admittedly stolen government documents? When state and local governments refuse to rein in officially conducted illegal activity and hold offending officials accountable, should citizens engage in illegal actions the way the Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI did in 1971?