OpenCdA believes that Black Lives Matter (BLM) meets the criteria for federal investigation to determine if the group’s actions amount to domestic terrorism as specifically defined in the US Code.
President Trump says he intends to declare Antifa to be a domestic terrorist organization. Should Antifa be worried about this Trumpian hyperbolic missile strike delivered via a late-night tweet on May 30?
Probably not. A President can declare a group of people to be a domestic terrorist organization if he wants to, but his tweeting his opinion doesn’t make it factually accurate or the group’s activities illegal.
On the other hand, the actions and activities of a group of people may violate very specific state or federal criminal laws. Taken together and proven to be related, those aggregated violations can amount to domestic terrorism. Regardless of how offensive the group’s name may be, laws proscribe behaviors and activities, not organizational names.
On 06-26-2020, Fox News reported AG Barr directs creation of task force to counter anti-government extremists such as Antifa, ‘Boogaloo group, more’. If AG Barr believes there is sufficient evidence to authorize a task force investigation of Antifa and Boogaloo group, then it seems logical he would conclude there is more than sufficient evidence to conclude that BLM warrants investigation, too.
In fact, that investigation may have already begun very quietly long before AG Barr’s memorandum was “leaked” to the Washington Post and reported on 06-26-2020. Barr has done that before. Recall that by the time he formally and publicly announced the appointment of US Attorney John Durham to investigate Mueller’s Russia probe, Barr and Durham had already begun that investigation weeks before. We hope he’s doing it again with BLM.
The purpose of this OpenCdA post is to help explain my reasons for believing a criminal investigation of BLM activities is warranted. (more…)