OpenCDA

May 27, 2012

Hiking Tubbs with the THF Pres.

Filed under: General — mary @ 2:48 pm

Yesterday I had the pleasure of hiking Tubbs Hill with Jennifer Johnson, the President of the Tubbs Hill Foundation (THF).  She wrote a wonderful My Turn column that was published in yesterday’s Press.  You can read it here.

Jennifer had me hiking trails on the backside of Tubbs that I have never seen before, and she was like a walking history of the Hill.  She showed me the steep slope of the north side and explained why a trail there would be so destructive.  According to Jennifer, the plans for a north side trail and a new City Hall trail head are not acceptable to THF.

On the east side of Tubbs, Jennifer showed me how the wheelchair accessible trail will be leveled up without much problem.  She pointed out the end of that section of the trail, culminating in a beautiful viewpoint over the lake, and she also showed me why the wheelchair trail cannot go any further without massive changes.  The city’s term “pilot project” for the wheelchair accessible trail is  something THF disagrees with because it implies there will be more.

We met so many nice people on the Hill during our walk!  People from all over our area and as far away as Edmonton.  Everyone was enjoying the trails in their natural state. Just the way I like them too.

What are your thoughts about Tubbs?  The Tubbs Hill Foundation?  The city’s plans?

6 Comments

  1. PS–the photo is from Tubbs, but not from yesterday…it was overcast and cold!

    Comment by mary — May 27, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

  2. Here’s a comment posted on the CdA Press site under the letter from Mayor Bloem denying her intention for a north side trail.
    This comment is from someone going by the screen name of “Bea”, and is dated May 26, 2012:

    Sandi is wrong. The Tubbs Hill Foundation board has been struggling with the Parks Dept. for two years. The Foundation is representing the public and is trying to protect Tubbs from development. Parks Dept. keeps insisting on developing a north side trail. Their comments have been documented by THF members who attended sessions over a period of seven months and are reported in the THF minutes…time after time after time.

    Notice that Sandi says “THE North Side Trail” as if one already exists. It doesn’t. “The” implies there is such a trail now. The only trail on the north side is the Third St. entrance/trail. I’m not even sure our mayor knows much about the hill.

    Parks Dept. changed the Tubbs Hill Mgmt./Open Space Plan this past winter and inserted a paragraph about a future north side trail despite the fact they had been told there is no support for hacking in another trail (earth-moving equipment, rock retaining walls, trees cut down, etc). This insert was without the Foundation’s knowledge or permission. And, of course, the public didn’t know either. The “My Turn” column in today’s paper addresses this issue in no uncertain terms. This column was written by the 17-member THF board and was presented to the Nat. Open Space Com. last week.

    When a master plan is presented by a city or county, everything in it will be followed in the coming years. Any statement about a north side trail will therefore give cover for future Parks Dept./city development.

    The Tubbs Hill Foundation did not publish anything about paved trails and railings. This information came from another source.

    Please read the “My Turn” column in today’s (May 26) Press. Search “Team Tubbs….”

    (The above statements are signed by a “Hard-working Volunteer” who spent a year on the Natural Open Space Committee before giving up in disgust because the fix was in.)

    Comment by mary — May 27, 2012 @ 3:35 pm

  3. The disability access to Tubbs Hill needs to be handled in a very delicate manner because, if folks oppose changes to Tubbs Hill. it will be blown out of proportion and portrayed negatively by those who want to see the area developed as a major attraction. That is exactly how they are pushing the “pilot” project (I think) – so they can gain access to bigger, better, and equal changes through the ‘first phase’ by allowing construction for the disabled. It’s a tough place to be, if you say you are not really for it or limit changes, it’s like you will be against children or something. I hope that the folks who hold this area dear to their hearts are able to save Tubbs Hill from it’s demise as well as the rest of Coeur d’Alene. Would be nice if folks could volunteer to be on these committees, that only a select few are appointed to, so they can also be included in the ‘no plan’ planning to present the city council,until,it is approved by the council who initiated the plan that really does not exist.

    Comment by Stebbijo — May 27, 2012 @ 6:17 pm

  4. It sounds as if at least a few on the Board of Directors of the Tubbs Hill Foundation have finally begun to get their heads out of their posteriors and recognize that the Mayor and City Council and their cronies have been conning them into complacency all along.

    Comment by Bill — May 27, 2012 @ 7:08 pm

  5. So, where does it end. Not EVERYTHING can meet ADA. Whats next, wilderness areas? I will geot old(er) some day. That does not mean that I should be accomodated for EVERYTHING!

    Comment by concerned citizen — May 27, 2012 @ 7:53 pm

  6. As I mentioned(toot,toot) more than a year ago, Doug Eastwood is the real “power” mayor. Her Sandiness just rents the title for her terms in office.

    Comment by Ancientemplar — May 28, 2012 @ 7:42 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress
Copyright © 2024 by OpenCDA LLC, All Rights Reserved