Shown above is Ruger’s newest handgun named in honor of our legislators. It’s called “The Congressman.”
It costs several million dollars, it makes a lot of noise, but it is totally worthless. It doesn’t work, and you can’t fire it.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Powered by WordPress
Copyright © 2025 by OpenCDA LLC, All Rights Reserved
The mood of the country, from the left and the right, just might support a populist driven call for Federal term limits.
Comment by Ancientemplar — August 8, 2011 @ 7:28 am
Let’s start by voting out all who have been part of the problem or allowed the problem.
Comment by mary — August 8, 2011 @ 8:31 am
Fixed that for you.
Comment by Dan — August 8, 2011 @ 8:37 am
Ancientemplar,
You may be right, and Dan’s method in comment 3 may prove to be the way term limits is applied. Let’s see how many of the Fools on the Hill decide not to seek re-election when their present terms are up.
Comment by Bill — August 8, 2011 @ 8:55 am
Very funny Dan! I thought about that but qualified it because of the new people who have tried to get some accountability. Without them, we’d be in a much bigger mess. And there are a few like Paul Ryan, Ron & Rand Paul, etc who have been constantly pushing for rational policy. Would you throw them out too?
Comment by mary — August 8, 2011 @ 12:39 pm
Absolutely. If Ron Paul has been in Congress for 24 years preaching the same message, then he’s been ineffective. Buh-bye.
Comment by Dan — August 8, 2011 @ 6:39 pm
You know, there’s this nonsensical email floating around, resent by everyone over and over, about the “28th Amendment.” It contains some feel-good language that would never pass legal muster, but it’s a popular notion: Restrict the perks of congressmen.
Seriously, though, the 28th Amendment effort should be on one thing: TERM LIMITS. I would start negotiating on the people’s side by saying ONE. I have enough wiggle room to go to TWO, but I would need massive concessions from the political class. Maybe two terms if they repeal the 16th Amendment.
Comment by Dan — August 8, 2011 @ 6:42 pm